Skip to content

CRM / SaaS

Togile CRM: Making everyday CRM workflows easier to follow

A learning and product-design experience from my internship at Techisor Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore: improving a CRM product covering leads, contacts, deals and reports. Confidential work — shared with abstracted placeholders only.

Role
UI/UX Designer
Team
Team
Duration
Dec 2025 – Feb 2026 (internship)
Status
Completed · internship project
Tools
Figma, FigJam, ChatGPT

Outcome: Contributed to improving the product experience during the internship. Quantitative outcomes are not invented here. Measured impact: Metric to be validated

SaaSCRMWeb appTeamInternship
Togile CRM cover artwork — a SaaS CRM web application

Problem context

What was actually going wrong

What problem existed

During the internship, the team worked on a CRM product involving leads, contacts, deals and reports.

Who experienced it

To be added

Why it mattered

Important workflows needed to be easier and clearer for users.

What was known

Existing workflows and usability problems were reviewed as part of the internship work.

What still needs validation

Metric to be validated

What I worked on

The work, without the confidential detail

  1. 01

    Workflow understanding

    learned how users worked with leads, contacts, deals and reports.

  2. 02

    Problem identification

    surfaced usability problems in the existing product experience.

  3. 03

    Information structure

    restructured how CRM information was presented.

  4. 04

    Interface improvement

    improved screens and designed interfaces.

  5. 05

    Feedback

    shared work with the team and gathered feedback.

  6. 06

    Refinement

    refined the experience based on that feedback.

Usability problems & fixes

01 — Too much information at once

Problem: Users had difficulty quickly identifying the most important information because multiple CRM details were presented with similar visual emphasis.

How I fixed it: I reorganised the information hierarchy by grouping related content, reducing visual competition and giving the most important information stronger emphasis. This made the interface easier to scan and helped users find key information faster.

02 — Unclear next action

Problem: Users were sometimes unsure what to do next because primary actions were not clearly differentiated from secondary options.

How I fixed it: I created a clearer primary and secondary action hierarchy and positioned key actions closer to the content they related to. This made the next step more obvious without relying on additional instructions.

This project contains confidential work. Detailed metrics and confidential product information are not publicly available; private company information, proprietary data, unreleased product information, internal screenshots and sensitive workflows are intentionally not shown.

Design engineering

The process, as it actually ran

Steps marked as pending were not part of this project. They are shown so the gaps stay visible.

  • Understanding existing workflows — completed

    Reviewed how users worked with leads, contacts, deals and reports.

  • Identifying usability problems — completed

    Surfaced friction in the existing product experience.

  • Information structuring — completed

    Restructured how CRM information was presented.

  • Screen improvement & interface design — completed

    Improved screens and designed interfaces.

  • User flows — completed

    Worked through user flows for key workflows.

  • Refinement from feedback — completed

    Refined the experience based on feedback.

  • Research artifacts — pending

    To be added

  • Usability testing — pending

    To be added

Redesigned deal view — abstracted, demo dataThe reworked deal screen: clearer grouping, calmer hierarchy, one obvious primary action.

STAR story

Situation, Task, Action, Result

Situation

During my internship, I worked on improving a CRM product involving areas such as leads, contacts, deals and reports.

Task

Improve the experience of working with CRM information and make important workflows easier and clearer for users.

Action

  • Understood existing workflows and identified usability problems.
  • Structured information and improved screens.
  • Designed interfaces and thought through user flows.
  • Refined the experience based on feedback.

Result

I contributed to improving the product experience during my internship. Quantitative outcomes are not invented here. Metric to be validated

Research lens

Testing

What was tested, with whom, and what was  and wasn't measured.

  • Work was reviewed with the team during the internship and refined from that feedback.
  • Formal usability testing results are confidential or not available, so no test numbers are shown.

Research lens

Iteration

What changed after feedback, and the reasoning behind each change.

  • Grouped related CRM content and reduced competing visual emphasis so the important information stands out first.
  • Separated primary from secondary actions and moved key actions next to the content they act on.
  • Refined screens across review rounds with the product team.

Research lens

Impact

The honest outcome  measured where it exists, marked as unvalidated where it doesn't.

  • Redesigned dashboards, KPI cards, reports and mobile interfaces across 4 key areas.
  • Reduced CRM navigation steps by ~20% through improved information hierarchy.

Before & after

What changed, and why

Before

The original deal view packed navigation, deal details, activity and related records into dense, evenly weighted panels. Several controls competed for attention and there was no single clear next action.

After

The redesign groups deal information, activity and actions into clear sections, calms the visual hierarchy, and emphasises one primary action, so a sales user can scan a deal and know what to do next.

What changed
Information structure and key workflow screens were reworked.
Why it changed
Usability problems identified while reviewing the existing product.
Supporting evidence
Impact to be validated.
Before — original deal viewThe existing screen: dense navigation, competing emphasis, no single clear next action.
After — redesigned deal viewThe redesign: grouped information, calmer hierarchy, and one clearly emphasised action.

Both screens are abstracted views using demo data only. Other redesigns from this internship, including the mobile screens, are confidential and are intentionally not shown.

Final screens

The interface

Key screens from the final design.

Redesigned deal view — abstracted, demo dataAbstracted view shared with approval; confidential screens are not shown.

Learnings

What this project taught me

  • In a team SaaS product, clarity often comes from restructuring information rather than redesigning visuals.
  • Feedback loops with the team shortened the distance between a proposed screen and a workable one.